Long Beach Homes For Sale

Long Beach Homes For Sale

  • Twitter

  • Long Beach Filipino Realtor
  • Contact Us

    562-508-6170 m
    562-961-1401 f
    Jason.Samia@gmail.com
    DRE License #01521061

  • Archives

California to Receive $18 Billion in Mortgage Settlement

Posted by jasonsamia on February 14, 2012

Source: C.A.R. Realegal

On February 9, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris announced that California secured up to $18 billion for its distressed homeowners as part of a $25 billion national multistate settlement with the country’s five largest loan servicers. More than $12 billion will be used to offer short sales or write down loans over the next three years for about 250,000 underwater homeowners in California, according to the attorney general. Relief will go to areas hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis within the first year of the settlement.

Although the actual settlement has not yet been released, the attorney general has stated that other financial benefits for California include $849 million for refinancing 28,000 borrowers who are underwater but current on their payments; $279 million restitution for 140,000 homeowners who were foreclosed upon between 2008 and 2011; $1.1 billion for unemployed homeowners, transitional assistance, and repairing blight; $3.5 billion to extinguish unpaid loans that remain after foreclosure for 32,000 homeowners; and $430 million to the state attorney general’s office for costs and fees. As part of a California guarantee, if the lenders fail to reduce principal balances by a minimum of $12 billion, they will be required to pay fines up to $800 million to the state.

The loans involved in this settlement are those owned or serviced by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Ally Financial Inc. The settlement releases the five named lenders from certain federal and state claims pertaining to robo-signing and other foreclosure misconduct by the lenders. It does not affect any individual’s rights to bring legal action against a lender. It also does not apply to the majority of mortgage loans, which are those owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

This mortgage settlement does not change any homeowner’s existing financial relationship with a settling lender. It does not relieve homeowners from any obligation. It does not require a settling lender to stop any foreclosure.

Homeowners seeking relief under the settlement agreement should contact their loan servicer or a HUD-approved housing counselor. More information including detailed FAQs is also available from the California Attorney General’s website, or visit the National Mortgage Settlement website.

Posted in Real Estate, Seller | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Principal Reduction – Mortgage deal could bring BILLIONS in relief

Posted by jasonsamia on February 10, 2012

Source:http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/09/news/economy/mortgage_settlement/index.htm?hpt=hp_t1

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) — In the largest deal to date aimed at addressing the housing meltdown, federal and state officials on Thursday announced a $26 billion foreclosure settlement with five of the largest home lenders.

The deal settles potential state charges about allegations of improper foreclosures based on robosigning, seizures made without proper paperwork.

The settlement includes the Justice Department and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as 49 state attorneys general — all but Oklahoma.

“We are using this opportunity to fix a broken system,” said U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder at the news conference announcing the settlement.

The settlement sets up a federal monitor to oversee the process and try to prevent roadblocks and red tape that tripped many homeowners seeking help in earlier programs designed to address the housing crisis.

President Obama said the settlement will “begin to turn the page on an era of wrecklessness that has left so much damage in its wake.”

“No action, no matter how meaningful, is going to by itself entirely heal the housing market,” he said in separate remarks. “But this settlement is a start.”

Most of the relief will go to those who owe far more than their homes are worth, known as being underwater on the loans. That relief will come over the course of the next three years, with the banks having incentives to provide most of the relief in the next 12 months.

“This settlement is about homeowners, homeowners in distress,” said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller at the news conference with state and federal officials.

What the settlement means to you

Principal reduction: At least $17 billion will go to reducing the principal owed by homeowners who are both underwater and behind on their mortgages.

The agreement calls for principal reduction for as many as 1 million people. But it’s unlikely the money will go that far, because many people need more than the $17,000 average reduction that would result if the money is split among 1 million homeowners.

At the same time, total principal reduction could go higher — to as much as $34 billion — since the agreement requires deeper principal reductions for the most troubled loans.

Refinancing: Officials say up to 750,000 other underwater homeowners who are current on their mortgages will be able to refinance their current loans at lower rates. They will not receive a reduction in principal, but with mortgage rates now near record lows, they could receive substantial savings on their monthly payments.

The settlement sets aside $3 billion to account for the reduced interest payments the banks will receive after the refinancing.

Robosigning payments: About $1.5 billion of the settlement will go to homeowners who had their homes foreclosed upon between Jan. 1, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2011, and who meet other criteria. They will receive up to $2,000 each.

Accepting that payment does not preclude homeowners who lost their home in an improper foreclosure from suing the bank to recover damages, Donovan said.

Participating banks: The five mortgage servicers that are parties to the settlement — Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) and Ally Financial — will pay a total of $5 billion to the states and federal government. Some of that money will go to foreclosed homeowners and the rest to the states.

Federal officials say negotiations are underway to expand the settlement to nine other major servicers, which would raise the overall value of the settlement to $30 billion.

Related settlements: The deal spurred pacts between the authorities and banks in similar cases.

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt announced a separate $18.6 million settlement that addressed homeowners whose homes were foreclosed through improper means, but did not provide help to those whose mortgages were underwater. He said he believes the broader agreement “overreached” the authority of both federal and state governments.

“We had concerns that what started as an effort to correct specific practices harmful to consumers, morphed into an attempt by President Obama to … fundamentally restructure the mortgage industry in the United States,” Pruitt said.

The Federal Reserve said it had reached an agreement with the five banks to pay $766.5 million in sanctions related to their servicing practices.

And Loretta Lynch, the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, N.Y., announced a $1 billion settlement with Bank of America to resolve claims of underwriting and mortgage origination fraud by BofA and mortgage lender Countrywide Financial, which BofA bought in 2008.

The bigger foreclosure problem: The $26 billion deal announced Thursday is the second biggest settlement ever involving states. It trails only the $206 billion pact in 1998 with the tobacco industry.

And it dwarfs any settlements that major Wall Street firms have reached to resolve other allegations of misdeeds related to the financial markets meltdown and the Great Recession.

Still it only will help a faction of those homeowners who are struggling with mortgages. The relief would not be available to those homeowners whose mortgages have been sold to the government-sponsored mortgage guarantors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

There are 1.5 million homeowners who are 90 days or more delinquent on their mortgages but not yet in foreclosure, according to the most recent estimate from the Mortgage Bankers Association. An additional 1.9 million are in the foreclosure process. And CoreLogic estimates that 11 million homeowners are underwater on their mortgages.

Obama proposes new home refinancing plan

The settlement does not preclude criminal prosecutions from being pursued. It also doesn’t stop investigations into other allegations of misdoings, such as the process of bundling loans into mortgage-backed securities and selling them to investors.

“It wasn’t the servicing practices that created the bubble nor caused the collapse,” said Donovan. “It was the origination and the securitization of these horrendous products. We will be aggressive about going after those claims.”

The deal is supposed to protect consumers when it comes to robosigning, and ensure that mortgage servicers agree to communicate better, avoid delays and give homeowners who are late on mortgage payments a fairer shake.

New York’s participation had been shaky this week, because some of the banks involved in the multi-state deal had also been sued by Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last week. Those banks — Bank of America, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase — had also asked for a legal pass from Schneiderman’s lawsuit, which accuses them of deceptive foreclosure practices for relying on the Mortgage Electronic Registration System.

On Tuesday, Schneiderman’s office organized a media briefing to talk about the deal and then canceled it minutes before it was supposed to begin.

0:00 / 3:54 One man’s fight against foreclosures
One man’s fight against foreclosures

The big question throughout the negotiations was how much money would be available to help homeowners, which depended on how many states agreed to the deal. California’s participation raises the total settlement value by several billion dollars.

At least one consumer advocacy group, the Center for Responsible Lending, has said the deal — while “no silver bullet” — leaves room to hold banks accountable in other mortgage probes, said Kathleen Day, a spokeswoman for the nonprofit.

But other left-leaning groups, including Move On and the New Bottom Line, are continuing to urge states to hold out for a big criminal investigation and a $300 billion settlement award.

Criminal prosecution still an option

–CNN’s Jessica Yellin contributed to this story. To top of page

First Published: February 9, 2012: 10:07 AM ET

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Interest Rate on 30-year mortgage falls to record low of 3.87 percent

Posted by jasonsamia on February 2, 2012

Average rate on 30-year fixed mortgage down to record 3.87 pct.; 15-year falls to 3.14 pct.

Lowest Interest Rates - Long Beach Homes for Sale

Lowest Interest Rates - Long Beach Homes for Sale

WASHINGTON (AP) — The average rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage fell this week to a record low, the ninth time that has happened in the last year. Even with the cheapest rates in history, the housing market remains depressed.

Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday that the rate on the 30-year loan dropped to 3.87 percent this week. That below the previous record of 3.88 hit two weeks ago.

The average on the 15-year fixed mortgage fell to 3.14 percent, also a record low. Records for mortgage rates date back to the 1950s.

Mortgage rates tend to track the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, which fell below 1.9 percent this week.

Rates have been low for more than a year, and the average rate on the 30-year loan has hovered near 4 percent for more than three months. Yet few people can afford to buy a home or qualify for a loan. Those who can have already done so.

High unemployment and scant wage gains have made it harder for many people to qualify for loans. Many don’t want to sink money into a home that they fear could lose value over the next few years.

Sales of previously occupied homes were dismal last year. New-home sales in 2011 were the worst on records going back half a century.

Builders are hopeful that the low rates could boost sales next year. But so far, they have had a minimal impact.
[Click here to check home loan rates in your area.]

Mortgage applications have risen slightly over the past four weeks, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. But they are coming off extremely low levels.

To calculate the average rates, Freddie Mac surveys lenders across the country Monday through Wednesday of each week.

The average rates don’t include extra fees, known as points, which most borrowers must pay to get the lowest rates. One point equals 1 percent of the loan amount.

The average fee for the 30-year loan rose to 0.8 from 0.7; the average on the 15-year fixed mortgage was unchanged at 0.8.

For the five-year adjustable loan, the average rate fell to 2.80 percent from 2.85 percent. The average on the one-year adjustable loan rose to 2.76 percent from 2.74 percent.

The average fee on the five-year adjustable loan rose was unchanged at 0.7; the average on the one-year adjustable-rate loan was unchanged at 0.6.

 

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/rate-30-mortgage-falls-record-150348941.html;_ylt=AmdZIHVnTk7btKlN55HJIWKiuYdG;_ylu=X3oDMTQzMG9rbW5sBG1pdANGaW5hbmNlIEZQIEp1bWJvdHJvbiBMaXRlBHBrZwM4ZTJjOGQ1NC0xNzk0LTNhYzEtYTU5YS0wMjBlYzQwYzVhZWYEcG9zAzEEc2VjA2p1bWJvdHJvbgR2ZXIDZjM2MDFmMjgtNGRiMS0xMWUxLWE0MjUtNzhlN2QxZmE0NDEy;_ylg=X3oDMTFvdnRqYzJoBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25zBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3

RATES

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

3 ways homebuyers kill their own real estate deals

Posted by jasonsamia on February 2, 2012

Mood of the Market

I recently bought a couple of spa treatment packages for a  friend’s birthday (as much as a gift to myself as to her, to be sure). The  package included a pedicure and a massage for the price of the massage, but had  a bizarro restriction that required I pick the gift cards up at least one day  prior to spa day.

The problem: The spa was across a bridge from my town.  Despite my very best calculations, I hit unexpected traffic and it took me an  hour’s drive just to pick them up.

It’s a good thing for the spa that I was literally stuck on that bridge, unable  to turn around; otherwise, that would have been an undone deal. I was very  clear that the value of my hour far exceeded the value of those two “pedis.”

In the end, the conditions I had to surmount to take  advantage of the bargain negated the value of the deal — and then some.
And that happens much more frequently than you’d think in the world of real  estate. Today’s ridiculously low prices and interest rates, combined, seem like  the perfect storm for finding a great deal.

But some buyers run into — or even unwittingly create –  circumstances in an effort to cash in on the bargain that deactivate or  diminish the full value they otherwise stand to gain from buying at the bottom  of the market, for both home prices and interest rates.
Here are three ways homebuyers are defeating their own deals in today’s market:
1. House hunting too long.  As many as 60 percent of the homes for sale in some markets are short sales.  Many other listings are bank-owned (also known as real estate owned or REO)  properties, and those homes tend toward two extremes: terrible condition, or so  nice at such a low price they receive multiple offers.

Even the nicer, nondistressed homes on the market can end up  in and out of contract over and over again due to appraisal or other  lending-related issues.
As a result, it is not at all bizarre to hear homebuyers today say they’ve been  house hunting for a year, 18 months, even two or three years. When you house  hunt that long, you become susceptible to house hunt fatigue, which causes  irrationally extreme overbidding out of sheer exhaustion.

Alternatively, it can cause you to settle for whatever house  you can get, even if it doesn’t actually meet your needs — then spend the next  10 years obsessively spending to upgrade, improve, repair and furnish the place  to try to make it more like the home you actually wanted.
Both of these outcomes negate and deactivate the bargain you stood to score.
To avoid house hunting too long, it’s uber-important to get and stay clear on  the differences between what you want and what you need, and to work with a  local real estate professional you trust.

Look to your agent to get and keep your expectations  centered in reality, so you can make more strategic decisions throughout your  entire house hunt, like house hunting in a price range where you’re likely to  both find homes that will work for your life and be successful in your  efforts to obtain one.
2. Making lowball offers way too low.  Overbidding seems like an obvious way to cancel out the bargain potential of  your deal. But making excessively low offers — offers sellers couldn’t afford  to take if they wanted to — can have the very same result.

Buyers who think they can operate strictly on the basis of  buyer’s market dynamics — without realizing that most sellers will need to  make enough to pay off their mortgage or at least receive the fair market value  for their home — are cutting off their own noses to spite their faces, all in  the name of trying to score an amazing deal.
Note to “lowballers”: If you don’t actually secure the home, the  superlow price you offered is no deal at all.
3. Freak-outs, stress, drama and  mayhem. Once was, it was mostly the buyers uneducated about the homebuying  process who tended to freak out and stress the most, especially at the top of  the market. These were the folks who found themselves defeated at every turn by  buyers who knew what they were up against and were prepared to make their best  offer on their first offer.
Fast forward, and now the norm is for buyers to spend much more time reading up  on what to expect, but the inundation of information can create brand new  mindset management challenges.

Almost every buyer is stressed about whether they can  qualify for a loan, and about buying into a down market. Some buyers try to  apply national headlines about home prices being depressed to the superlocal  dynamics of their neighborhood market.

This is unwise if you happen to be, for example, trying to  buy a home in the boomtown real estate markets of Silicon   Valley. Others go the opposite direction and deny that the basic  truths about, say, buying a short-sale listing will actually apply to them  (attention homebuyers: buying a short sale usually takes a long, long time).
The emotional freak-outs that result from having your expectations shattered,  sometimes brutally, in the course of buying a home often lead to panic-based  and fear-based decisions, which can be costly in the short and long term.  Additionally, the stress itself can take a toll on your ability to be  productive at work, and can even impair your relationship with your mate,  neither of which are worth any deal you think you stand to strike.
Again, managing your expectations by working with a trusted broker or agent you  feel comfortable relying on to understand the market in your neck of the woods  and the type of transaction you want to pull off is essential to downgrading  the role emotion plays in your real estate decision-making.

Source: http://lowes.inman.com/newsletter/2012/02/02/news/175752

Posted in Buyer, FYI, Real Estate | Leave a Comment »

Refinance vs Loan Modification

Posted by jasonsamia on February 1, 2012

Interest rates have been very low for several years, and right  now they are lower than ever, yet millions of mortgage borrowers who could  profit from a refinance haven’t.

Similarly, millions of borrowers who are having trouble  making their mortgage payments but want to remain in their homes could have  their mortgages modified to make the payment affordable but haven’t.

The reasons in both cases probably include apathy, resignation  and ignorance, but this article is about ignorance only. I find that many  borrowers are even hazy about the difference between a refinance and a  modification.

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-142054p1.html" target=blank>Road sign image</a> via Shutterstock.com.

In a refinance, you take out a new mortgage, either from  your current lender or from a different one, and use the proceeds to pay off  your existing mortgage. In a modification, the terms of your current mortgage  are changed by your existing servicer, usually for the purpose of reducing the  payment.

Most often this involves an interest-rate reduction, but it may also  include a term extension and, in some cases, the loan balance may be reduced.

A refinance is a market-based transaction entered into by a  lender who wants the new loan. A modification is an administrative measure  designed to prevent the costs of a foreclosure. In both cases, however, the  borrower must document an ability to make the new payment.

Refinance profitably  if you can

In general, borrowers should refinance if a profitable  refinance option is available to them. A refinancing will not drop a borrower’s  credit score, while a modification will. Refinancing borrowers can deal with their  existing lenders but are free to shop alternatives.

A modification is a lot more complicated, takes a lot more  time, and borrowers are wholly dependent on their existing servicers, which  means that they have no bargaining power.

Qualifying for a refinance  vs. qualifying for a modification

Declining home values have severely restricted the ability  of many borrowers to refinance by eroding the equity in their homes. (Equity is  property value less the mortgage balances.) With an important exception noted  below, borrowers who have negative equity cannot qualify.

Borrowers with equity of 3 percent to 20 percent can qualify  if they purchase mortgage insurance, which in some but not all cases will  eliminate the profit from the refinance.

Borrowers with equity of 20 percent or more are best  positioned to refinance profitably. In contrast, insufficient or negative  equity will not bar a modification.

A low credit score will also prevent a refinance, but not a  modification. Because lenders have become extremely risk-averse in the  post-crisis market, credit scores have increased in importance and are related  to equity.

On a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage, for example, the minimum score is usually 620,  but a 620 score may require equity of 15 percent. If the borrower’s equity is  the minimum of 3 percent, the required credit score is likely to be 660.

Borrowers who have suffered income declines to the point  where the ratio of housing expense to income is viewed as excessively high will  have their refinance applications rejected. However, an income decline of this  magnitude will not necessarily prevent a loan modification.

On the contrary, an income decline that weakens the ability  of the borrower to continue current payments but still enables the borrower to  afford lower payments is the major problem loan modifications are designed to  meet.

Borrowers can check on whether they qualify for a refinance  using the new qualification calculator on my website.

The HARP exception

The earlier statement that borrowers with negative equity  cannot refinance has a major exception: If their loan is owned by Fannie Mae or  Freddie Mac, they are eligible for refinancing under the Home Affordable  Refinance Program (HARP). This program was recently extended and liberalized.

The previous negative equity ceiling of 25 percent was eliminated for  fixed-rate mortgages; fees were reduced; the requirement for a new appraisal  was eliminated in some cases; and incentives were provided to the lenders  servicing the loans to refinance them.

Qualifying for a  modification

Determining whether a borrower is eligible for a  modification is a complicated exercise on which the rules are anything but  clear. The government-supported program, which differs from the strictly  private programs, requires that the borrower’s income be large enough to afford  a reduced payment but it cannot exceed 3.23 times the current mortgage payment.  Further, the borrower cannot have “sufficient liquid assets” to make  the payments, whatever that means.

In addition, the owner of the loan must be better off with  the modification than without it, which is determined by a complicated  algorithm that is available to servicers but not to borrowers or to me. The  servicer has the final say.

Source: http://www.inman.com/buyers-sellers/columnists/jackguttentag/refinance-or-modify-while-its-still-possible

Posted in Buyer, FYI, Real Estate, Seller | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

6 tips for a successful loan mod

Posted by jasonsamia on February 1, 2012

http://seg.sharethis.com/getSegment.php?purl=http%3A%2F%2Fjasonsamia.wordpress.com%2Fwp-admin%2Fpost-new.php%3Fpost_type%3Dpost&jsref=&rnd=1328139056514

Avoid rookie mistakes when preparing, submitting your document package

By Jack Guttentag Inman News®

Millions of mortgage borrowers who can no longer afford  their mortgage payments but can afford a lower payment can avoid foreclosure by  getting a modification of their loan contract. While the path to a modification  remains torturous, it is not quite as bad as when I wrote addressed the issue in a 2009 column.

Are you unqualified?

It is not possible for borrowers acting on their own to  determine whether they qualify for a modification because they don’t have  access to all the criteria. Some is kept under wraps by loan servicers.  However, borrowers can determine that they are not qualified for a  government-supported modification by accessing a questionnaire provided by  the U.S. Treasury Department.

Bear in mind, however, that servicers also offer  modifications outside of the government’s program. You might qualify for one  even if you don’t meet the government’s requirements.

Compiling the  information the servicer wants

The single most important step in obtaining a loan  modification is providing the servicer with the exact information the servicer  needs to make a decision. Each servicer has its own set of forms that must be completed,  and its own requirements for the documentation you must provide.

In my first stab at this problem, I placed the information  required by each of the major servicers on my website. Now borrowers can access  the DMM Document Wizard,  provided at my request by Default Mitigation Management LLC, which is a lot  better. Based on your answers to the questions it asks, you will be provided  with a customized list of forms you must complete and documents you must  provide. It is free and will take the guesswork out of what you need.

Don’t exaggerate your  financial shortcomings

Warning: The servicer will examine your statements of income  and expenses to determine whether you can afford a reduced payment. Exaggerating  your financial weaknesses may open his heart but close his purse, if it makes  you appear to be a lost cause.

Assuring accuracy

Having the right form is one thing, but filling it out  correctly is something else. Some industry executives estimate that about 95  percent of all packages submitted are incomplete or contain errors. A package  with obvious errors may fall to the bottom of the pile, or it may lead the  servicer to conclude that you do not qualify for a loan modification when, in  fact, you do. Remember what you were taught in second grade: Neatness counts!

In addition:

1. Use a cover sheet that identifies all documents in your  package.

2. Write your name and loan number on every page.

Assuring delivery

Preparing an accurate and complete set of documents is one  thing, but delivering the package to the servicer is something else. Servicer  systems have been overwhelmed by requests for help, and documents routinely get  “lost.” You want to minimize the chances of that happening to you.

Using fax or  certified mail: Make sure you have the correct contact information.  Treasury provides addresses and fax numbers of every mortgage servicer.  Certified mail is more reliable than fax, but neither guarantees prompt  attention by the servicer, or even that the documents won’t subsequently be  misplaced or lost.

Using the DMM portal:  The best way to deliver documents to servicers is to use the DMM portal,  available through the DMM Document Wizard  by clicking on “Submit,” or visit www.dclmwp.com.  I have no financial interest in DMM.

Using the portal, your documents are delivered to the  servicer electronically, and the portal then becomes a direct communication  channel to the servicer. The servicer uses the portal to acknowledge receipt of  your documents and to request additional information or documents. You use the  portal to make corrections, to send additional information, and to update  yourself on what has been completed and what remains to be done.

Questions by you are automatically directed to the specific  employee who can answer them. All communications are time-stamped and remain in  the portal as a record of borrower/servicer exchanges.

Unfortunately, not every servicer subscribes to the DMM  Portal. The list of those that do is shown on the DMM Wizard.

Follow up, and then  follow up again

Because the process of modifying mortgages remains slow and  error-prone, you may need to nudge the servicer. If you faxed your documents,  you should follow up to make sure the papers haven’t been lost and the case is  in an active queue. But even if you use the DMM Portal, you should follow up  with the servicer regularly to make sure your application is on track.

Source: http://lowes.inman.com/newsletter/2012/02/01/news/175561

Posted in FYI, Real Estate, Seller, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Sellers: Don’t overdo it on home improvements

Posted by jasonsamia on February 1, 2012

http://seg.sharethis.com/getSegment.php?purl=http%3A%2F%2Fwordpress.com%2F%23post&jsref=&rnd=1328138654411

Know which projects are worth the cost, effort

By Dian Hymer Inman News®

Homeowners who are thinking about selling this year should be aware of  what today’s buyers are looking for in a home. It will affect what you should  do to get your home ready for sale, and how you should price it.

A survey by the National Association of REALTORS® in 2011 found that  buyers favor walkable neighborhoods that are close to shops, restaurants and  local businesses over neighborhoods that require more driving between home,  work and recreation.

According to the survey, 77 percent of the respondents said they would  look for pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods. Improvement in public  transportation was favored over building new roads.

Most buyers (80 percent) still prefer to live in a single-family,  detached home as long as it doesn’t require a longer commute. Although space is  important to most buyers, 59 percent said they would accept a smaller home if  it cut 20 minutes off the commute time.

Does this mean your chances of selling are slim if you don’t have a high  Walk Score? No, but proximity to a popular commercial area usually brings a  higher price.

In Oakland, Calif., this is evident if you compare homes in the Rockridge area  with homes in the Oakland Hills. The housing recession has hit the entire area, but  Rockridge prices have dropped less than home prices in the Oakland Hills.

One Rockridge home recently sold for $20,000 more than it did in 2005,  and the house had not been substantially changed. From this location you can  walk to trendy shops and cafes as well as to BART, the region’s rapid transit  system. By rail, it’s a mere 20 minutes to the financial district in San  Francisco.

HOUSE HUNTING TIP: Proper pricing is the key factor affecting the  salability of your home in today’s market. Make sure you’re comparing apple to  apples when you evaluate the probable selling price of your home.

The home-sale business is all about location. If you live in a  neighborhood where you have to drive to get to work, school or recreation, you  can’t expect to sell for the same price as a comparable home that’s in a  desirable, walkable location.

You can’t change the location of your home, but you can appeal to  today’s buyers who are typically looking for a home that is in good condition  that they can move right into without doing any major work.

A common refrain heard from sellers is that there’s no point in painting  or changing worn carpet — buyers will surely want to do something different. In  some cases, this may be so, but many buyers don’t have extra cash to pay for  extensive home improvements. They may ultimately change the color scheme, but don’t make them worry about making the house livable when they buy.

It’s a good idea to consult with your real estate agent before you make  fix-up improvements. Review your list of preparation-for-sale projects and get  your agent’s feedback before starting any work.

Sometimes, sellers think projects need to be done that are really not essential in successfully marketing the home. For instance, your yard may be in poor condition,  but this doesn’t mean that you should have it re-landscaped. This is the kind  of improvement you’d do for yourself if you were planning to stay in the house  for years. A cosmetic redo will usually suffice.

Get your agent’s or stager’s input on colors, light fixtures, carpeting,  etc., so that you can ensure a positive response to your efforts. Also, watch  your costs. You don’t need to do a top-of-the-line paint job or use the most  expensive granite for your countertops in order to sell. In fact, it will eat into  your proceeds from the sale.

THE CLOSING: Stick to cost-effective, tasteful improvements for maximum  appeal at a reasonable cost.

Source: http://lowes.inman.com/newsletter/2012/02/01/news/175568

Contact Dian Hymer:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Buy vs Rent

Posted by jasonsamia on January 26, 2012

Is It Better to Buy or Rent?

Don’t be BLIND and think you’re not paying a mortgage when you rent, because YOU ARE PAYING A MORTGAGE. The question you should be asking is “WHOSE MORTGAGE ARE YOU PAYING?” Are you paying YOURS or your LANDLORD’S?

1) Consider your Lifestyle

For some people, buying their home makes the most sense, and for others, renting is best. To determine which is right for you, you first need to determine whether you can afford to buy. Then you need to consider other factors, including the time you’ll stay in your new home, the home’s prospects for appreciation and taxes. Just answer the following questions and we’ll advise you on what seems best for you.

Visit this site to help you determine your lifestyle: http://www.bankrate.com/calculators/mortgages/rent-or-buy-home.aspx

2) Consider what makes sense Financially

Whether renting is better than buying depends on many factors, particularly how fast prices and rents rise and how long you stay in your home. Compare the costs of buying and renting a home in the calculator below. Go to this site to help you determine if the numbers work for you:

BUY vs RENT Calculator Tool

Click the advanced settings button to change inputs such as your rate of return on investments, condo/common fees and your tax bracket.

Below is a very CONSERVATIVE SAMPLE that I ran.  It’s a $400,000 house (3bed 2bath) that would normally rent for about $1,800 a month if not more.  And as you can see, it is more expensive to rent than to own starting on the 7th year!!!

And if you play around with the numbers a bit more, you will find that renting will become more expensive sooner than 7 years as the purchase price of the house decreases from $400,000 example that we used.  I can even show you some properties where it’s actually cheaper to own NOW than to continue to rent.

If you have any questions on how to use this awesome tool, please call or email me.  I’d be happy to go over some numbers with you.

buy vs rent - Long Beach homes for sale

buy vs rent

buy vs rent - buy settings

buy vs rent - buy settings

rent vs buy - rent settings - long beach homes for sale

rent vs buy - rent settings - long beach homes for sale

rent vs own - other settings - long beach homes for sale

rent vs own - other settings - long beach homes for sale

own vs rent - year by year analysis

own vs rent - year by year analysis

Methodology

The calculator keeps a running tally of the most common expenses of owning and renting. It also takes into account something known as lost opportunity costs — for example, the return you could have earned by investing your money instead of spending it on a down payment. The calculator assumes that the profit you would have made in your investments would be taxed as long-term capital gains and adjusts the bottom line accordingly. The calculator tabulates lost opportunity costs for all parts of the buying and renting scenarios.

Buying

Purchase costs are the costs you incur when you go to the closing for the home you are purchasing. This includes the down payment and typical closing costs.

Yearly costs are recurring monthly or yearly expenses. These include mortgage payments, condo fees (or other community living fees), renovation costs, maintenance costs, property taxes and homeowner’s insurance. Property taxes, the interest part of the mortgage payment, and in some cases, a portion of the common charges, are tax deductible. The resulting tax savings is accounted for in each item’s totals. The mortgage payment amount increases each year for the term of the loan because the tax credit shrinks each year as the interest portion of the payments becomes smaller.

Lost opportunity costs are tracked for the initial purchase costs and for the yearly costs. The former will give you an idea of how much you could have made if you had invested the down payment instead of buying your home.

Selling costs are the costs you incur when you go to the closing for the home you are selling. This includes the broker’s commission and other fees, as well as the remaining principal balance that you pay to your mortgage bank. “Proceeds from home sale” is the money that you receive from the person who is buying your home. This amount is equal to the value of the home that year and is shown as a negative number since it is not something that you spend money on, but rather, it is money you receive.

If your cumulative buying total is negative, it actually means you have done very well: you made enough of a profit that it not only covered the cost of your home, but also all of your yearly operating expenses.

Renting

Initial costs are the rent security deposit and, if applicable, the broker’s fee.

Yearly costs are the monthly rent and the cost of renter’s insurance.

Lost opportunity costs are calculated each year for both your initial costs and your yearly costs.

Leaving your rental is equal to the rent security deposit, typically returned to a renter at the end of a lease.

Posted in Buyer, FYI, Real Estate, Seller, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Historical Interest Rates (we are currently at it’s lowest in history)

Posted by jasonsamia on January 24, 2012

Home » Resource Center » Data and Charts Center » Interest Rate Statistics » Historic LongTerm Rate Data

Historical Treasury Rates

Historical Rates - Long Beach Homes For Sale

Historical Rates - Long Beach Homes For Sale

This visualization displays long term rate data

Posted in Buyer, Real Estate, Seller | Leave a Comment »

Short Sale Deficiencies Fact Sheet

Posted by jasonsamia on January 24, 2012

Source:http://www.car.org/legal/foreclosure-short-sale-folder/short-sale-deficiencies/

On July 15, 2011, the California legislature enacted a new law expanding the protection for a homeowner against personal liability after a short sale.  In a short sale, a homeowner sells a property for less than the outstanding loan balance owed.  The difference between what’s owed on the mortgage loan and what the lender receives as a payoff is called a deficiency.  The following charts are easy-to-use reference guides for REALTORS® and their clients to determine the general applicability of anti-deficiency protections for short sales and foreclosure.  These charts do not cover all aspects of any individual case or situation.


For a printer-friendly version of Short Sale Deficiencies Fact Sheet Click Here  pdf (PDF file–Adobe Acrobat Reader Required**)

** Acrobat Reader is free downloadable software that will enable members to read any PDF files.


Short Sale Deficiencies Fact Sheet
General Rule A mortgage lender is generally prohibited from pursuing a deficiency or deficiency judgment for a short sale involving a one-to-four residential unit property.
Prohibited Acts Where applicable, a mortgage lender involved in a short sale is prohibited from engaging in any of the following acts: – Collecting a deficiency; – Having a borrower owe a deficiency; – Requesting a deficiency judgment; – Having a court render a deficiency judgment; or – Requiring the borrower to pay any additional compensation, aside from the proceeds of the sale, in exchange for written consent to a short sale. – Requiring the borrower to waive any of the above protections.
Applicability A borrower is protected under this law if all of the following requirements are met, and no exception applies: – Mortgage loan is solely secured by a deed of trust; – Mortgage loan is for a one-to-four residential unit property; – Borrower sells for less than the outstanding loan balance owed; – Lender provides a written short sale approval; – Title voluntarily transfers to a buyer by grant deed or other conveyance document recorded in the county where the property is located; and – Proceeds of the sale have been tendered to the lender or lender’s agent in accordance with the parties’ agreement.
Exceptions Exceptions include any of the following: – Lender seeking damages for fraud or waste; – Borrower is a corporation, LLC, or limited partnership; – Cross-collateralized loan (special rules apply); – Borrower is a political subdivision of the state; – Bond lien; or – Public utility lien.
Effective Date July 15, 2011.  The new law protects a borrower who closes escrow after the law came into effect on July 15, 2011.  For short sales that closed escrow before July 15, 2011, the borrower may be protected for a first trust deed under the previous law or by asserting other legal arguments.
Practice Tip Regardless of the law, it would be prudent for a borrower to obtain the lender’s written and signed agreement to release the borrower from any and all liability for the mortgage loan, and to report “no deficiency balance” to the credit bureaus.
Legal Authority The full text of Senate Bill 458 (codified as section 580e of the California Code of Civil Procedure) is available at www.leginfo.ca.gov.
Short Sale v. Judicial Foreclosure Is Homeowner (1-to-4 units) Generally Protected Against Deficiency?
Type of Mortgage Loan After Short Sale * After Judicial Foreclosure*
First Trust Deed Yes Yes, if purchase-money and owner-occupied
Second or Other Junior Trust Deed Yes Yes, if purchase-money and owner-occupied
Purchase Money Loan Yes Yes, if owner-occupied
Rate-and-Term Refinance Yes No
Cash-Out Refinance Yes No
Owner Occupied Home Yes Yes, if purchase money
Non-Owner Occupied Home Yes No

*Note: Certain exceptions may apply, including fraud, bad faith waste, and for foreclosures, a wiped-out junior lienholder when a senior lienholder forecloses.  Also, no deficiency judgment shall be rendered if a lender forecloses by non-judicial foreclosure (or a trustee’s sale) (CCP § 580d) or if a loan is seller financed (CCP § 580b).  Although most lenders in California foreclose by non-judicial foreclosure, the decision to pursue judicial or non-judicial foreclosure is made by the lender, not borrower.  For more information, C.A.R offers our members other legal articles, including Short Sale Deficiencies, available at http://qa.car.org.


This chart is just one of the many legal publications and services offered by C.A.R. to its members.  For a complete listing of C.A.R.’s legal products and services, please visit www.car.org.

Readers who require specific advice should consult an attorney.  C.A.R. members requiring legal assistance may contact C.A.R.’s Member Legal Hotline at (213) 739 8282, Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Saturday, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.  C.A.R. members who are broker-owners, office managers, or Designated REALTORS® may contact the Member Legal Hotline at (213) 739 8350 to receive expedited service.  Members may also submit online requests to speak with an attorney on the Member Legal Hotline by going to http://www.car.org/legal/legal-hotline-access/.  Written correspondence should be addressed to:

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Member Legal Services 525 South Virgil Avenue Los Angeles, California 90020


The information contained herein is believed accurate as of September 14, 2011. It is intended to provide general answers to general questions and is not intended as a substitute for individual legal advice. Advice in specific situations may differ depending upon a wide variety of factors. Therefore, readers with specific legal questions should seek the advice of an attorney.  Written by Stella H. Ling, Esq.

Copyright© 2011, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.). Permission is granted to C.A.R. members only to reprint and use this material for non-commercial purposes provided credit is given to the C.A.R. Legal Department. Other reproduction or use is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of the C.A.R. Legal Department. All rights reserved.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,150 other followers